What ho, Englishmen!
As you know, my wife is a woman of exemplary breeding. She can trace her noble lineage back even farther than I can - to Mary, Queen of Scots, no less. And oh, she is a handsome woman! She has the countenance one finds only in the English upper classes - the gloriously wide mouth, the broad nose (nostrils gently flaring), the meaty, powerful gnashers, and the dogmatic chin of a shire thoroughbred. Yes, Lady Crouchback is what some would pejoratively term "horsey", but I love her all the more for it. Indeed, I distrust any Englishman whose wife is not horsey.But I am a man of monstrous demands. No woman, no ten women, could possibly satisfy my bodily needs. I am to boffing what the Krauts are to warmongering: it is my reason for being. I use mistresses by the dozen, by the hundred, even by the thousand. I boff for Sussex, for England and for St George. In Kensington alone, I keep one Russian filly, one French filly, one Italian filly, one Arab chap, and a magnificent, voluptuous Nigerian girl.
However, as the nights draw in and the climes become icy, I become less predisposed to run the gauntlet of brigands and highwaymen lurking on the M23. Accordingly, I have a longstanding arrangement with Lady Crouchback that one mistress of my choosing can be housed in the Castle's west wing for my pleasant usage during the months of December, January and February.
But now? Now my good lady wife is acting up. She has decided that such "pagan immorality" is in direct contradiction of the teachings of the Catholic church. She claims that my blood pressure is too high for such regular dalliances. She suggests that she, Lady Crouchback, is growing cold from neglect and deserves a deuced good boffing herself on occasion. She even - outrageously - calls in Father Fitzpatrick to lecture me on my conjugal duties.
I shan't deny that these provocations have tested my temper. "Curb thy tongue, woman!" I say. "Where else should I house my mistress? In the pig sties? Good God, Henrietta, do you wish me to disturb myself by travelling the icy roads to London?"
But she remains unyielding. So I ask whether any of you chaps can offer some advice for a fellow in my situation? I fear it will take the nuclear option - i.e. a quick call to Coutts and a salutary lesson in the power of wonga - to force her back into the realm of sanity.
Yours, etc
Viscount Crouchback
My Dear Lord Crouchback,
I had a similar problem a few years back with my wife. My solution was to hire a handsome, virile, athletic young west African chap to work in my stables. Lady Antrim took to him straight away and that soon put an end to any discussion of mistresses. As an added bonus, Kwame also helps satisfy some of my more, ahem, 'peculiar' requirements so I can heartily recommend a three-legged African to solve your marital problems.
Yours etc,
Lord Antrim.
Posted by: Lord Antrim | 01 December 2009 at 12:47 PM
Jolly good thinking, Lord Antrim. I did hire a young Brazilian fellow called Reinaldo for precisely those purposes. The plan was for him to assist Lady Crouchback with the interior decoration whilst always remaining on hand to satisfy the bodily needs of either myself or my wife.
Regrettably, however, Reinaldo has taken up with a young bartender in the White Hart and now throws a hissy fit whenever either of us demands his affections. I would throw him out on his over-used rear end, but Lady Crouchback has developed an unfortunate soft spot for the fellow and declares that the Castle would go to rack and ruin without his eye for a nice rug or painting.
I plan to surprise Reinaldo in the hallways one of these nights, but in the meantime I shall give some thought to hiring an African chappie, though I do worry that the stocks of Vaseline required would make Kwame-2 an expensive proposition.
Posted by: Viscount Crouchback | 01 December 2009 at 04:39 PM
Father Fitzpatrick is probably better qualified to give advice on Kwame-2 and vaseline, than on run-of-the-mill conjugal duties. And i can't believe i've joined in this conversation. Mr Whitfield and Mr Wesley will be turning in their graves - if only to shield their backsides from god forsaken sodomites!
By the way, my Lord, I see that 'Dave' has taken yet another step toward the wholesale prolerisation of the Tories. Sickening, what?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/dec/01/double-barrelled-names-tories
Posted by: Blondy2 | 01 December 2009 at 06:12 PM
Well, I am from the Craig Brown school of thought when it comes to surnames, old bean...
From today's Mail:
Q. Is David Cameron right to ask Conservative candidates to drop their double-barrelled names so as to appear less posh?
A. It is more likely that David Cameron is performing a double bluff. Realising that the electorate prefers its Conservative candidates to have the aura of tweed, he wants them to switch to single-barrelled names so that they sound more posh rather than less.
Cameron has realised that rollcalls at primary schools are full of children with recently constructed double-barrelled names, the result of the current trend for women wishing to retain their own surnames when marrying or having children.
Nowadays, if John Smith marries Jane Brown, it is likely that their daughter will be christened Jemima Smith-Brown. And it is not going to end there. In 20 years' time, when Jemima Smith-Brown marries Freddy Jones-Wilson, Jemima will, quite understandably, want to hang on to her birth-name, and their child will be quadruple-barrelled: Mary Smith-Brown-Jones-Wilson.
After another 20 years, Mary Smith-Brown-Jones-Wilson will marry Keith Robinson-Clark-Clifford-Lane, and they will give birth to Jack Robinson-Clark-Clifford-Lane-Smith-Brown-Jones-Wilson. And so on, until entire parties will consist of nothing more than introductions.
But posh families know that the only way to stay posh is by staying one step ahead of the common game. This means that those with long-standing double-barrelled names will increasingly be drawn to dropping any superfluous names they have acquired over the centuries.
Soon the single-barrelled name will be the ultimate status symbol, and voters wanting a grandee for an MP will home in on candidates called Nancy Mogg rather than the much more common Annunziata Rees-Mogg.
Posted by: Viscount Crouchback | 01 December 2009 at 06:49 PM
But of course. A ruse to give Hyacinth Bucket and friends the slip. I like it. Phew, maintaining one's exclusivity sounds like hard work, though. Bit like an arms race.
Posted by: Blondy2 | 01 December 2009 at 07:14 PM