What ho, proles!
Interesting comments from Peter Bills:
Of course, defences are far better organised nowadays, that is undeniable. But it might also be something to do with the fact that nowadays, the professional game has all but excluded the real thinking players, those who wish to study and become doctors, scientists, lawyers or captains of industry.
In 1962, the Lions were led on their tour to South Africa by a Scottish wing, Arthur Smith, who became a nuclear scientist. Brilliant minds abounded throughout the game and although it was then an amateur sport, the brain power was often in evidence simply by the way the game was played.
Nowadays, those past great breeding grounds of knowledge, Oxford and Cambridge Universities, which supplied endless numbers of players for the national rugby teams of the world, including South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, produce hardly any.
The professional game has different creatures, and I suspect, the vast majority are of infinitely less cerebral capacity.
'Tis true, is it not? Modern rugger players are dullards. They don't read. They cannot converse in Greek or Latin. They don't attend the opera. They don't complete the Times crossword. Often, their cultural hinterland extends no further than the Nintendo Playstation. And then we wonder why their play is similarly witless!
Bills is onto something here. Johnson ought to get on the telephone to my alma mater and request a few of their finest rugger men. Tim Catling and Ross Swanson ought to be top of the list. We need beef; we need beastliness; but we also need brains.
Yours, etc
Viscount Crouchback
Recent Comments